0000094: Abrams turret armor

(0000219)
vlad_8011 (viewer)
2014-12-29 13:23

And heres a video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BaVbLhk0Tzc&feature=youtu.be [^]

(0000221)
vlad_8011 (viewer)
2014-12-29 13:36

"So you are comparing an utilitarian car ( T-72 ) with a 4x4 ( Abrams )" ????
T-72 have no need to have stronger engine beacuse its lighter so we can say both are 4x4

(0000222)
MistyRonin (administrator)
2014-12-29 22:18

Abrams = 25 hp x tone

T-72 = 20 hp x tone

Ergo the T-72 is 1/5 less powerful than the Abrams ( in the same way most of 4x4 are more powerful than utilitarians, an average of 1/5 ).

Check that you don't have activated the reinforced armor option.

(0000223)
MistyRonin (administrator)
2014-12-29 22:23
edited on: 2014-12-29 22:24

The Abrams turret armor lateral ( 380mm ) is practically twice as the T-72 ( 280 ).

T72

http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/row/t72tank.htm [^]

"The turret has conventional cast armor with a maximum thickness of 280-mm, the nose is about 80-mm thick and the glacis is 200-mm thick laminate armor. Besides the PAZ radiation detection system, the T-72 has an antiradiation liner (except on export models) and a collective NBC filtration and overpressure system."

Abrams

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-vOPsuo26iU0/T6fLhqD5YuI/AAAAAAAAAqk/UoYGIIzMtEI/s1600/m1a2los.png [^]

Issue History
Date Modified	Username	Field	Change
2014-12-29 13:22	vlad_8011	New Issue
2014-12-29 13:23	vlad_8011	Note Added: 0000219
2014-12-29 13:29	vlad_8011	Note Added: 0000220
2014-12-29 13:30	vlad_8011	Note Deleted: 0000220
2014-12-29 13:36	vlad_8011	Note Added: 0000221
2014-12-29 22:18	MistyRonin	Note Added: 0000222
2014-12-29 22:23	MistyRonin	Note Added: 0000223
2014-12-29 22:24	MistyRonin	Note Edited: 0000223	View Revisions
2014-12-29 22:24	MistyRonin	Note Edited: 0000223	View Revisions
2014-12-29 22:25	MistyRonin	Status	new => closed
2014-12-29 22:25	MistyRonin	Assigned To	=> MistyRonin
2014-12-29 22:25	MistyRonin	Resolution	open => no change required

Notes
(0000219) vlad_8011 (viewer) 2014-12-29 13:23	And heres a video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BaVbLhk0Tzc&feature=youtu.be [^]

(0000221) vlad_8011 (viewer) 2014-12-29 13:36	"So you are comparing an utilitarian car ( T-72 ) with a 4x4 ( Abrams )" ???? T-72 have no need to have stronger engine beacuse its lighter so we can say both are 4x4

(0000222) MistyRonin (administrator) 2014-12-29 22:18	Abrams = 25 hp x tone T-72 = 20 hp x tone Ergo the T-72 is 1/5 less powerful than the Abrams ( in the same way most of 4x4 are more powerful than utilitarians, an average of 1/5 ). Check that you don't have activated the reinforced armor option.

(0000223) MistyRonin (administrator) 2014-12-29 22:23 edited on: 2014-12-29 22:24	The Abrams turret armor lateral ( 380mm ) is practically twice as the T-72 ( 280 ). T72 http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/row/t72tank.htm [^] "The turret has conventional cast armor with a maximum thickness of 280-mm, the nose is about 80-mm thick and the glacis is 200-mm thick laminate armor. Besides the PAZ radiation detection system, the T-72 has an antiradiation liner (except on export models) and a collective NBC filtration and overpressure system." Abrams http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-vOPsuo26iU0/T6fLhqD5YuI/AAAAAAAAAqk/UoYGIIzMtEI/s1600/m1a2los.png [^]

Relationships