RHS Feedback
My View | View Issues | Change Log | Roadmap | My Account
  

View Issue Details [ Jump to Notes ] [ Issue History ] [ Print ]
IDProjectCategoryView StatusDate SubmittedLast Update
0006567AFRF[All Projects] Generalpublic2021-12-05 08:312021-12-05 22:05
ReporterLukegotjellyfish 
Assigned To 
PrioritynoneSeverityminorReproducibilityalways
StatusnewResolutionopen 
PlatformOSOS Version
Product Version 
Target VersionFixed in Version 
Summary0006567: 9M127 penetration suffers against angled armour
DescriptionThe 9M127 loses more speed against flat and angled armour than other (T)HEAT warheads despite airFriction, submunitionInitSpeed and submunitionInitialOffset being identical.

The screenshot was taken from RHSDEV+ArmaDev but this also happens on Stable+2.06
Steps To ReproduceHit flat/angled surfaces with 9M127 and compare speed on penetration with any other THEAT/HEAT warhead.
TagsNo tags attached.
Is it a wish/request?No
RHS versionDevelopment
Arma 3 versiondevbranch
Did you used any other mod when the error occurred?No
Which mods?
Attached Filespng file icon Missile comparison.png [^] (1,051,865 bytes) 2021-12-05 08:31

- Relationships

-  Notes
(0011979)
reyhard (administrator)
2021-12-05 15:25

 your observations are actually wrong - problem is with TOW and other missiles most likely since they should lose more speed on surfaces with better CE coef
(0011980)
Lukegotjellyfish (reporter)
2021-12-05 22:05

 Yes, this does seem to be the case, I neglected to test the 9m127 properly against other angled armour seeing as how it performed slightly worse on flat surfaces (~950m/s as opposed to 1000m/s)

- Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
2021-12-05 08:31 Lukegotjellyfish New Issue
2021-12-05 08:31 Lukegotjellyfish File Added: Missile comparison.png
2021-12-05 15:25 reyhard Note Added: 0011979
2021-12-05 22:05 Lukegotjellyfish Note Added: 0011980

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 MantisBT Team
Powered by Mantis Bugtracker