RHS Feedback - AFRF
View Issue Details
IDProjectCategoryView StatusDate SubmittedLast Update
0006567AFRF[All Projects] Generalpublic2021-12-05 08:312021-12-05 22:05
ReporterLukegotjellyfish 
Assigned To 
PrioritynoneSeverityminorReproducibilityalways
StatusnewResolutionopen 
PlatformOSOS Version
Product Version 
Target VersionFixed in Version 
Is it a wish/request?No
RHS versionDevelopment
Arma 3 versiondevbranch
Did you used any other mod when the error occurred?No
Which mods?
Summary0006567: 9M127 penetration suffers against angled armour
DescriptionThe 9M127 loses more speed against flat and angled armour than other (T)HEAT warheads despite airFriction, submunitionInitSpeed and submunitionInitialOffset being identical.

The screenshot was taken from RHSDEV+ArmaDev but this also happens on Stable+2.06
Steps To ReproduceHit flat/angled surfaces with 9M127 and compare speed on penetration with any other THEAT/HEAT warhead.
Additional Information
TagsNo tags attached.
Relationships
Attached Filespng Missile comparison.png (1,051,865) 2021-12-05 08:31
https://feedback.rhsmods.org/file_download.php?file_id=2362&type=bug
Issue History
Date ModifiedUsernameFieldChange
2021-12-05 08:31LukegotjellyfishNew Issue
2021-12-05 08:31LukegotjellyfishFile Added: Missile comparison.png
2021-12-05 15:25reyhardNote Added: 0011979
2021-12-05 22:05LukegotjellyfishNote Added: 0011980

Notes
(0011979)
reyhard   
2021-12-05 15:25   
your observations are actually wrong - problem is with TOW and other missiles most likely since they should lose more speed on surfaces with better CE coef
(0011980)
Lukegotjellyfish   
2021-12-05 22:05   
Yes, this does seem to be the case, I neglected to test the 9m127 properly against other angled armour seeing as how it performed slightly worse on flat surfaces (~950m/s as opposed to 1000m/s)