RHS Feedback - SAF
View Issue Details
0006193SAF[All Projects] Generalpublic2021-03-08 17:422021-03-09 07:39
nevalashkarus 
Jastreb 
noneminoralways
resolvedwon't fix 
 
 
Stable
0006193: SAF vest armor level
PBB M-99T and M-12 have bullet protection same as PBB M-98. But 98 is bulletproof vest while 99T and 12 are simple vests without any protection.

Still waiting for this:
https://www.artstation.com/artwork/W2rkoD [^]
damage, gear, improvements
Issue History
2021-03-08 17:42nevalashkarusNew Issue
2021-03-08 19:18JastrebTag Attached: damage
2021-03-08 19:18JastrebTag Attached: gear
2021-03-08 19:19JastrebTag Attached: improvements
2021-03-08 19:25JastrebNote Added: 0011512
2021-03-08 19:27JastrebStatusnew => resolved
2021-03-08 19:27JastrebResolutionopen => won't fix
2021-03-08 19:27JastrebAssigned To => Jastreb
2021-03-09 07:39nevalashkarusNote Added: 0011518

Notes
(0011512)
Jastreb   
2021-03-08 19:25   
PBB MD12 is ballistic tactical vest, it can be worn without plates but in combat plates are ofc there. Same for any other PBB type vest, as its always in two parts, tactical and ballistic vest.

True that however at this time M99T is composed of only tactical vest, and armor protection was added for future proofing as it will be replaced with combined model as on the link you have shown.

So this is intentional and I'm very well aware of it.

https://www.armyequipment.com/en/products/ballistic-products/ballistic-vests/ballistic-vest-pbb-md-12 [^]
(0011518)
nevalashkarus   
2021-03-09 07:39   
I judged by ingame model. And it doesn't look like a vest with plates, it looks like default tactic vest maybe with some peace of kevlar.

Sorry if I was wrong. On this picture it looks more armored than ingame.
https://www.mycity-military.com/imgs4/159270_112120114_IMG_20150626_110609.jpg [^]

"armor protection was added for future proofing" sad to hear that. M-99T are awesome for various rebel factions, but it has armor config same as 6B23.