RHS Feedback - AFRF
View Issue Details
0006010AFRF[All Projects] Generalpublic2020-11-08 18:522020-11-09 08:41
tonimontana0328 
reyhard 
noneminoralways
closedno change required 
 
 
No
Stable
2.00
No
0006010: 3UBR (6 8 11) and 3UOF8 airfriction values are swapped
It seems like the airfriction values of 30mm 3UBR6 3UBR8 3UBR11 and 3UOF8 are swappped. 3UBR11 has a friction value of 0.00056 and 3UOF8 has 0.0002. It should be the other way around considering 3UBR11 is an apfsds round.

The 25mm bradley rounds have the same airfriction values but there the APFSDS rounds have the lower airfriction values.

So either braldley or BMP values are wrong.
No tags attached.
png ballistics.png (23,407) 2020-11-08 18:52
https://feedback.rhsmods.org/file_download.php?file_id=2242&type=bug
png
Issue History
2020-11-08 18:52tonimontana0328New Issue
2020-11-08 18:52tonimontana0328File Added: ballistics.png
2020-11-08 19:53reyhardNote Added: 0011247
2020-11-08 19:53reyhardStatusnew => closed
2020-11-08 19:53reyhardAssigned To => reyhard
2020-11-08 19:53reyhardResolutionopen => no change required
2020-11-08 21:22tonimontana0328Note Added: 0011250
2020-11-08 21:27tonimontana0328Note Edited: 0011250bug_revision_view_page.php?bugnote_id=11250#r7119
2020-11-08 21:27tonimontana0328Note Edited: 0011250bug_revision_view_page.php?bugnote_id=11250#r7120
2020-11-09 08:41reyhardNote Added: 0011252

Notes
(0011247)
reyhard   
2020-11-08 19:53   
According to our sources that's correct and while it might sound weird, it matches also reticles found on BMP2. I'm not sure about 3UBR11 though but I guess they kept it backward compatible with older vehicles?
(0011250)
tonimontana0328   
2020-11-08 21:22   
(edited on: 2020-11-08 21:27)
But should it no be the same on the bradley then? There shapes are very similar so they air restiance should be compareble?
For example this is the 25mm M919 https://www.inetres.com/gp/military/cv/weapon/25mm/25mm_M919_00.gif [^] and this is 3ubr11 https://external-preview.redd.it/uyWBuLwmoNmeyNK0lC2aUqpamKuFgvcX4BhnIKkh6h4.jpg?width=640&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=46892c889c3630998596223ad020919df1397ca5. [^] How would they have such differnce ballistics when the weight and shape are so similar. Does make much sense to me.


I would understand it on the 30mm non APFDSDS round like ubr6 and ubr8 but not ubr11.

(0011252)
reyhard   
2020-11-09 08:41   
Do you have some some ballistic data on it? I'm wondering now how Russian Army solved the fact that there is one static reticle on i.e. BTR80A - there you can load i.e. UBR11. Unless it shouldn't be able to load UBR11...