RHS Feedback - USAF
View Issue Details
0005979USAFGeneralpublic2020-10-27 19:122020-10-27 19:29
THE_WOLF_2020 
reyhard 
nonefeaturealways
closedwon't fix 
 
 
Yes
Development
1.98
Yes
0005979: NEW SNIPER RIFLE
The United States Army announced that with the purchase of new sniper rifles, BARRETT has signed a contract for the production of MRAD rifles that will have versions for 7.62, .300win and .338 for Lapua Magnum.
When used by special forces, they will be produced in three calibers to facilitate logistics and maintenance.
Add the Rifle in the three calibers to bring a more realistic RP to the milsim houses, as well as making it compatible with ACE3 for Advanced Ballistics, as this rifle is extremely accurate and as the USAF only has the M2010 .300WIN and M107 that are the biggest snipers of sniper rifles, these .338 rifles will be a great option, because as the M2010 is light but its ammunition above 1600m ends up getting weaker to the point of needing two shots to kill a target and the M107 which is heavier and has no suppressor, leaving no option for stelf, so a .338 rifle with a suppressor would be of great use.
I am not criticizing or speaking ill of RHS, as my companions and I used RHS since the beginning of our milsim house where we simulated the USMC.
I am a sniper, I like to calculate and kill in the first shot and in the information that I pass to the squads, I always use the M2010 for stelf and M107 for fire base, but in the long distance the .300WIN does not kill in the first shot and if necessary, do not pierce the walls (of course, in that sense the .338 would be an AP ammunition), but still a rilfe to stay between the M2010 and the M107 would be very good.

link: https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/26940/u-s-special-operators-are-getting-new-sniper-rifles-for-the-second-time-in-six-years [^]
No tags attached.
Issue History
2020-10-27 19:12THE_WOLF_2020New Issue
2020-10-27 19:29reyhardStatusnew => closed
2020-10-27 19:29reyhardAssigned To => reyhard
2020-10-27 19:29reyhardResolutionopen => won't fix

There are no notes attached to this issue.