RHS Feedback - USAF | |||||
View Issue Details | |||||
ID | Project | Category | View Status | Date Submitted | Last Update |
0005085 | USAF | [All Projects] General | public | 2019-06-12 22:38 | 2019-06-21 08:47 |
Reporter | Lumnuon | ||||
Assigned To | reyhard | ||||
Priority | none | Severity | trivial | Reproducibility | always |
Status | closed | Resolution | no change required | ||
Platform | OS | OS Version | |||
Product Version | |||||
Target Version | Fixed in Version | ||||
Is it a wish/request? | No | ||||
RHS version | Stable | ||||
Arma 3 version | 1.90 | ||||
Did you used any other mod when the error occurred? | No | ||||
Which mods? | |||||
Summary | 0005085: SAF/CDF faction naming convention is inconsistent with the rest of RHS | ||||
Description | Not sure if this is intentional or an oversight but the naming convention for the factions that depict armies of stable countries are inconsistent. USAF and AFRF use "Country name ("Military Branch")" while SAF and GREF use "Military name ("Military Branch")". This is trivial at best, just something that seems like an inconsistency to me. | ||||
Steps To Reproduce | |||||
Additional Information | |||||
Tags | No tags attached. | ||||
Relationships | |||||
Attached Files | |||||
Issue History | |||||
Date Modified | Username | Field | Change | ||
2019-06-12 22:38 | Lumnuon | New Issue | |||
2019-06-20 23:32 | reyhard | Note Added: 0009513 | |||
2019-06-20 23:32 | reyhard | Status | new => closed | ||
2019-06-20 23:32 | reyhard | Assigned To | => reyhard | ||
2019-06-20 23:32 | reyhard | Resolution | open => no change required | ||
2019-06-20 23:35 | Lumnuon | Note Added: 0009514 | |||
2019-06-21 08:47 | reyhard | Note Added: 0009516 |
Notes | |||||
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|||||
|
|
||||
|
|||||
|
|