RHS Feedback - AFRF
View Issue Details
0004076AFRF[All Projects] Generalpublic2018-04-12 15:222018-04-12 21:57
THE RUSSIA 
PuFu 
nonetweakalways
closedno change required 
 
 
Yes
1.82
No
0004076: M27 IAR recoil too high
M27 IAR seems to use the exact mechanics as M4 whereas in my limited understandig of the development of the HK416 and hence the M27IAR suggests the gas system is far superior to the M4's and indeed has improved accuracy.

Consider slightly reducing recoil on the M27IAR
No tags attached.
Issue History
2018-04-12 15:22THE RUSSIANew Issue
2018-04-12 15:42PuFuNote Added: 0007610
2018-04-12 15:43PuFuStatusnew => closed
2018-04-12 15:43PuFuAssigned To => PuFu
2018-04-12 15:43PuFuResolutionopen => no change required
2018-04-12 16:29THE RUSSIANote Added: 0007613
2018-04-12 21:57PuFuNote Added: 0007618

Notes
(0007610)
PuFu   
2018-04-12 15:42   
quite the contrary, gas systems have more recoil than direct impingement ones.
(0007613)
THE RUSSIA   
2018-04-12 16:29   
well everything I've read says the M27 is more accurate but it seems as if the performance in game is just a cut 'n paste of the M4?

I'm happy to be corrected but I can't see the difference in recoil.
(0007618)
PuFu   
2018-04-12 21:57   
HK 416 and based weapons are using the same recoils as M4, since, according to sources, due to the short stroke system, the difference are negligible.
https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-difference-between-AR15-and-HK-416 [^]

The main plus for the gas operated system is not accuracy - or not when we are talking about properly cleaned and low fired weapons, it is reliability, which we do not simulate in RHS.