RHS Feedback - USAF
View Issue Details
0002310USAF[All Projects] Generalpublic2016-06-11 03:142016-06-11 08:45
CecilRhodes 
RedPhoenix 
normalminoralways
closedsuspended 
 
 
Yes
1.60
No
RHS USAF
0002310: M4 Carl Gustav, Body Armor Inconsistencies, Stryker
The Army currently employs the M4 Carl Gustav in AT/assault units. It would be nice to have it ingame. Also, the US body armor seems somewhat inconsistent with regard to protection. The SPC has a higher degree of protection than the IOTV, which makes no sense, as both utilize the same E-SAPI plates (NIJ Class IV protection vs. .30-06 AP), and the IOTV has a greater degree of coverage of the soldier. This would be easy to fix, with one simply making the protection uniform across platforms. Also, having the M113 but not the Stryker seems odd, as most US Army combat units use the Stryker in direct operations. It has protection vs. 14.5mm all arcs. Having this in-game would add greatly to realism.
N/A
N/A
No tags attached.
Issue History
2016-06-11 03:14CecilRhodesNew Issue
2016-06-11 03:16CecilRhodesPrioritynone => normal
2016-06-11 03:16CecilRhodesSeverityfeature => minor
2016-06-11 03:16CecilRhodesSummaryM4 Carl Gustav, Body Armor Inconsistencies => M4 Carl Gustav, Body Armor Inconsistencies, Stryker
2016-06-11 03:16CecilRhodesDescription Updatedbug_revision_view_page.php?rev_id=2916#r2916
2016-06-11 08:45RedPhoenixNote Added: 0004681
2016-06-11 08:45RedPhoenixStatusnew => closed
2016-06-11 08:45RedPhoenixAssigned To => RedPhoenix
2016-06-11 08:45RedPhoenixResolutionopen => suspended

Notes
(0004681)
RedPhoenix   
2016-06-11 08:45   
Please only one issue per ticket