RHS Feedback - USAF
View Issue Details
0005085USAF[All Projects] Generalpublic2019-06-12 22:382019-06-21 08:47
Lumnuon 
reyhard 
nonetrivialalways
closedno change required 
 
 
No
Stable
1.90
No
0005085: SAF/CDF faction naming convention is inconsistent with the rest of RHS
Not sure if this is intentional or an oversight but the naming convention for the factions that depict armies of stable countries are inconsistent.

USAF and AFRF use "Country name ("Military Branch")" while SAF and GREF use "Military name ("Military Branch")".

This is trivial at best, just something that seems like an inconsistency to me.
No tags attached.
Issue History
2019-06-12 22:38LumnuonNew Issue
2019-06-20 23:32reyhardNote Added: 0009513
2019-06-20 23:32reyhardStatusnew => closed
2019-06-20 23:32reyhardAssigned To => reyhard
2019-06-20 23:32reyhardResolutionopen => no change required
2019-06-20 23:35LumnuonNote Added: 0009514
2019-06-21 08:47reyhardNote Added: 0009516

Notes
(0009513)
reyhard   
2019-06-20 23:32   
Well, there are no better alternatives to it imo
(0009514)
Lumnuon   
2019-06-20 23:35   
Why not go with Serbia (Military Branch)/Chernarus (Military Branch)? Would keep it consistent with the rest of RHS and would make it easier to tell the factions apart if there are numerous factions available
(0009516)
reyhard   
2019-06-21 08:47   
It's not going to be consistent with rebel factions then